![]() ![]() Logic as a native system with a dual processor (the one I was thinking about) can be a very powerful system. Digital performer vs logic Pc#Check out the download of SX (for PC only). It is a very capable system to many PT users give it a bad rap. I particularly liked Cubase's integration with Rewire, and all VST Instruments. Over the last 6 weeks before I decided to go HD, I seriously looked at native systems. If so and you went for PT's and Logic as a front end thats a pretty big learning curve. You said you just want to dip your toes again. Have you looked at possibly just running a native system?. Theres always something else you seem to need and it never ends. Total extra's just to use DAE $1500 approx. I use Logic as a front end.so not only did I have to buy Logic, I had to bu the HD extension, and the EBS TDM bridge. For midi its about the worst you can get I'm sorry to say. Its simplicity is actually a hinderance to me.Īgain for 'Audio' editing its superb. when you do a session with 30 audio tracks and 20 midi tracks you will see that working in PT can become very chaotic for heavy midi users like myself. But I and many others beleive that severely enhanced midi editing is badly needed. PT's 2 screen approach is admirable (the mix screen, and thearrangemet screen). If you look at all the other apps out there you will see that they have multiple screens eg double click a midi or audio region and up pops another screen for editing. Its midi imo is terrible from sloopy timing, to actual editing. It simply handles audio way better than anything else out there. If you dont think you will be using much midi then PT is definitely the one. Digital performer vs logic software#The only major drawback with PT is it's the most expensive software in the market, since you have to get its hardware to make it run. Digital performer vs logic pro#Most of the posts above pose the right points when I started out with audio on computer I got to work on several different softwares (Cubase, Vegas Audio, Logic, Cakewalk) and got used to those with different effort for each one then I got the chance to work on Pro Tools: the think that hit me immediately was its ease of use: within 30 seconds from its startup I was able to import and manipulate an audio file, a thing that took me half an our in Cubase, and still have to be resolved in Logic (but maibe it's just me.) I think that nowdays all of the major editing software have almost the same features, and thus the difference is in how you feel comfortable working with a paticular one over another it also depends on what your main business is: if you are a MIDI programmer I would choose the Logic route (a little more diffcult to learn and use, not so Logic in the ned, even though I know lots of people who swear by it) if you will be doing mostly audio, then Pro Tools is the best multitrack editing and Mixing software I've ever worked on, as far as GUI, ease of use, support (better on the Mac side), interfacing with other AV setups, sound quality and diffusion in the pro market.ĭon't know Digital Performer personally, but as good as it can be I still like the 2 windows approach that Pro Tools offers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |